Browse By

It’s Time for Twitter Premium Accounts

Former TechCrunch writer Nick Gonzalez’s post “Who Owns Your Social Media Accounts“, as a reply to my Twitter Needs Better Username Policy (the ‘celtics’ fiasco), got me thinking…

This is the perfect opportunity for Twitter to start with Premium accounts. Charging whatever the price may be — $3/mo or $3/yr for example. The user then locks in their Twitter username and similar rules that govern domains are applied. First come, first served — and of course an arbitrator if there’s a trademark conflict.

A Twitter username can serve as an identity to someone, just as a phone number does. As Nick mentions, it’d be a cruel world if the phone company just swiped your cell phone number and changed it on you — wouldn’t it?

The question still remains, if my ‘celtics’ account had been all about Celtic Knots, would Twitter have confiscated my username and handed it over to the Boston Celtics NBA team? [Are they even sure it is the Boston Celtics NBA team, and not just some other person out there pretending to be them?]

  • Pingback: » Evan - Twitter needs a better policy on Usernames - By Steve Poland - Ideas for Making Money Online()

  • Lucious

    A bit mistified as to why a column/blog in the NYT online tech section would want to link to your blog. Has something to do with twitter but I think the NYT blogger is gay and has a crush on you.

    Yu ought to hit him up, I’m betting he has lots of money making ideals for you.

  • Jean carl

    if twitter ask for a premium and consider itself as a DNS, it is as far i am concerned the biggest hold up organised by a tech service for the decade to come.

    i really do not care to be called jcarl or jcarlo or anything else.
    every service could do that, six apart as well in that case, blogger as well

    it is not a service that can be billed